Friday, April 20, 2012
dynamic wealth management: Static vs. Dynamic Investment Policy: Matching As...
dynamic wealth management: Static vs. Dynamic Investment Policy: Matching As...: http://www.schultzcollins.com/files/staticvsdynamic.pdf Many investment policies have guideline asset allocations that target a constant ...
Static vs. Dynamic Investment Policy: Matching Asset Management to Investor Risk Preferences
http://www.schultzcollins.com/files/staticvsdynamic.pdf
Many investment policies have guideline asset allocations that target a constant
proportional weighting between stocks and bonds during both bull and bear markets. A
“Constant Mix” asset management approach is defensible under a variety of commonly
held assumptions. Generally, a recommendation to “stay the course” during volatile
market conditions implicitly assumes that investors, will benefit from a Constant Mix
approach. Investors, however, are not a homogeneous group; and, for some, changes in
wealth may cause changes in risk tolerance. Wealth management, therefore, may require
dynamic changes in both asset allocation as well as other aspects of investment policy
such as rebalancing, distribution and monitoring & surveillance policies.
This article outlines several asset management approaches and discusses the importance
of aligning Investment Policy with investor risk preferences. If the investment policy
ignores this critical “calibration,” there is little hope that the investor will be able to
maintain the policy during recessionary periods. It presents a follow on simulation study
to illustrate the range of possible portfolio evolutions under various asset management
approaches. Finally, it focuses on how investment advisors can transition from static
(“blueprint” oriented) to dynamic (“systems engineering” oriented) investment policy by
using advanced simulation tools and by transforming set-in-stone asset management
guidelines into a sequence of periodic decisions regarding the exercise of asset
management options.
Many investment policies have guideline asset allocations that target a constant
proportional weighting between stocks and bonds during both bull and bear markets. A
“Constant Mix” asset management approach is defensible under a variety of commonly
held assumptions. Generally, a recommendation to “stay the course” during volatile
market conditions implicitly assumes that investors, will benefit from a Constant Mix
approach. Investors, however, are not a homogeneous group; and, for some, changes in
wealth may cause changes in risk tolerance. Wealth management, therefore, may require
dynamic changes in both asset allocation as well as other aspects of investment policy
such as rebalancing, distribution and monitoring & surveillance policies.
This article outlines several asset management approaches and discusses the importance
of aligning Investment Policy with investor risk preferences. If the investment policy
ignores this critical “calibration,” there is little hope that the investor will be able to
maintain the policy during recessionary periods. It presents a follow on simulation study
to illustrate the range of possible portfolio evolutions under various asset management
approaches. Finally, it focuses on how investment advisors can transition from static
(“blueprint” oriented) to dynamic (“systems engineering” oriented) investment policy by
using advanced simulation tools and by transforming set-in-stone asset management
guidelines into a sequence of periodic decisions regarding the exercise of asset
management options.
dynamic wealth management: DYNAMIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT, ASSET AND OTHER FINANCI...
dynamic wealth management: DYNAMIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT, ASSET AND OTHER FINANCI...: http://dynamicwealth-management.com/ Starships, warp speed, transporters, phasers. Think Star Trek technology is only the stuff of fict...
DYNAMIC WEALTH MANAGEMENT, ASSET AND OTHER FINANCIAL ADVISORY
http://dynamicwealth-management.com/
Starships, warp speed, transporters, phasers. Think Star Trek technology is only the stuff of fiction? Think again.
Dr. Peter Jansen, a PhD graduate of the Cognitive Science Laboratory at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, has developed a scientific measurement device based on the tricorders used by Captain Kirk, Spock, Dr. McCoy and other space adventurers on the classic TV series that has spawned numerous spin-offs in more than 45 years.
“Star Trek inspired me to be a scientist” said Jansen, who has been formally working on his tricorder prototypes since 2007, but toying with the idea of making a functioning device since he was “a kid in high school.”
Advertisement: Story continues below
The 29-year-old Jansen’s school days spanned the late 1990s when Star Trek: Voyager was on the air. It featured his favorite tricorder, a model with screens on top and bottom.
The first tricorder appeared on the original show’s initial episode in 1966, when Capt. Kirk swaggered toward audiences with his phaser weapon holstered to his side but a tricorder in his hand. The hand-held devices for data sensing, analysis and recording, have been a part of Star Trek ever since.
But if Jansen, a self-confessed “addicted maker” of things, is successful at developing, testing and bringing his instrument into the public, the tricorder may not be just the stuff of Star Trek prop rooms. It may be used for real.
Jansen said his tricorder can take atmospheric measurements, or ambient temperature, pressure or humidity. It can take electromagnetic measurements to test magnetic fields, and it can make spatial measurements of distance, location, or motion.
Fascinating, as Spock might say.
Jansen thinks of his tricorder as a “general tool” – a kind of “Swiss Army Knife” – with practical uses in building inspection, for instance, where it might help taking temperature and humidity readings or be a distance sensor to measure rooms.
It resembles the device carried by countless “Away Team” members in Star Trek – The Next Generation – his favorite of the Star Trek shows, he notes.
No science fiction
No independent group has yet verified his claims for the device which, he said, is one reason for placing his designs on a public website as an “open source” that technology makers can utilize to test and tinker.
Jansen has posted schematics and designs of his first and second prototypes, the Mark 1 and Mark 2, for anyone to see and build. Jansen expects to have his latest version, the Mark 4, produced for “about $200.”
“Everything you need to build one is on line” at www.tricorderproject.org, said Jansen. He hopes others will follow his lead.
While it may sound like the stuff of science fiction, Jansen isn’t the only one to take notice of just how useful a real functioning tricorder would be – especially as a medical tool.
Telecommunications giant Qualcomm this year launched the “Tricorder X-Prize Contest” with the slogan “Healthcare in the palm of your hand.” Qualcomm hopes to motivate developers with a $US10 million prize to make medical tricorders a reality.
Wanda Moebus of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, who is not affiliated with Jansen or Qualcomm, told Reuters the X-Prize “is really cool,” but cautioned that making a real medical tricorder device “would have to be measured on its safety and effect, like all other medical technologies.”
Jansen said he has been approached by “a couple of teams” about the X Prize, but added that his prototypes are more for science research than medical tools.
Besides, he said he already is on to his next frontier, making a sort of “replicator,” another Star Trek device that will create 3D objects and foods that are dimensional copies of real items.
Jansen’s “replicator” is a 3D printer, which in itself is not really new, but the scientist thinks about it in terms reminiscent of Star Trek’s famous prologue. It’s “like nothing we’ve ever seen before,” Jansen said.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)